Offer
Provide additional details about the offer you're running.
I’ve been in this industry a long time, and there’s something I need to say plainly.
This is the quiet scandal of the broth industry and almost no one explains it properly because once you do, the whole house of cards starts wobbling.
Bone broth has been marketed into oblivion. Gut health. Collagen. Glow. Healing. And yet, very few people are ever told how the broth they’re buying is actually made.
That’s not accidental.
Because once you understand the process, you start asking uncomfortable questions and not every product survives those questions.
Real bone broth is not clever.
It’s not engineered.
It’s not optimised for margins.
It’s bones, water, and time.
Bones are simmered long enough for minerals, gelatin, and amino acids to naturally move into the liquid. Nothing is forced. Nothing is added later to “fix” it.
If that broth is dried properly, the only thing removed is water.
That’s it.
No starch.
No fillers.
No rebuilding.
Just broth, minus the liquid.
Most commercial broth powders don’t stay intact through processing.
Somewhere between cooking and packaging:
So instead of asking why that happened, many manufacturers patch it up.
This is where reconstructed broth comes in.
Reconstructed broth is broth that’s been broken — then rebuilt to behave like broth again.
That rebuilding usually looks like:
On paper, it still qualifies as “bone broth”.
On a nutrition panel, it can look impressive.
But functionally, it’s no longer whole.
It’s been engineered to resemble broth — not preserved as broth.
That distinction matters.
This number sounds authoritative. It’s not.
There is no clear, regulated definition of what “94% bone broth” actually means.
It does not have to mean:
In most cases, it means:
So yes — you can legally say “xx% bone broth” and still be selling a formulation.
Big percentages look transparent.
They’re often anything but.
This is my biggest issue with the industry, and I won’t dance around it.
Tapioca starch is used because:
It exists to solve a manufacturing problem, not a nutritional one.
From a gut health perspective:
If starch is needed to make your broth behave like broth again, then something went wrong earlier.
That’s not ancestral food.
That’s formulation.
Collagen should already be in bone broth. Naturally.
So when collagen is added back in, it tells me one thing:
it didn’t survive the process.
Either it was lost, removed, or damaged.
Adding collagen later is not the same as preserving it from the start. It’s a workaround, and a convenient one, because collagen powder is cheap and marketable.
Real broth doesn’t need protein boosting.
It already earned it.
This is where another category sits — shelf stable broth pastes and liquid concentrates.
Here’s the simple truth:
Real broth is wet, nutrient-dense, and perishable.
So to make it:
it has to be pushed well beyond its natural state.
That usually means:
None of this is illegal. But none of it is neutral either.
The more you push broth away from what it naturally is, the more you change how it behaves in the body.
That’s the trade off of shelf stability — and it deserves to be understood, not glossed over.
At Broth of Life, we don’t hide behind percentages or clever wording.
We start with:
We cook it properly as broth first.
Then we dry it carefully so the structure stays intact.
We don’t:
Our ingredient list looks like food because it is food.
It’s harder.
It’s slower.
It costs more.
But it survives scrutiny — and that matters.
If you’re buying bone broth for gut health, healing, or nourishment, the process matters as much as the ingredients.
Labels don’t tell the full story.
Percentages can distract.
Buzzwords are cheap.
Understanding how your broth was made is where the truth is.
And if a brand can’t clearly explain that — without smoke and mirrors — it’s worth asking why.
Because once you understand the difference between real broth and reconstructed broth, you can’t unknow it.
| Feature | Real Bone Broth (Properly Made & Dried) | Reconstructed Broth Powders | Shelf-Stable Pastes & Liquid Concentrates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Bones, water, time | Broth that has lost structure during processing | Liquid broth pushed beyond natural limits |
| How nutrition is achieved | Naturally extracted from bones through long cooking | Lost during processing, then rebuilt | Altered through reduction, salt, heat, or stabilisation |
| Processing philosophy | Preserve what’s there | Break → rebuild | Push → stabilise |
| Need for fillers (e.g. tapioca starch) | ❌ No | ✅ Yes, to add bulk & mouthfeel | ❌ Usually no starch, but other compromises apply |
| Added collagen | ❌ No — collagen is naturally present | ✅ Often added back in | ❌ Not usually added, but structure may be altered |
| Texture & mouthfeel | Comes from natural gelatin | Engineered to mimic broth | Achieved through reduction, salt, or processing |
| Shelf stability | Achieved by removing water only | Achieved through formulation | Achieved through heavy reduction and/or stabilisation |
| Salt levels | Moderate, culinary | Variable | Often high to ensure stability |
| Impact on gut health | Intact amino acids & gelatin | Diluted by fillers | Altered by processing intensity |
| Ingredient list transparency | Looks like food | Often looks like a formulation | Often minimal, but process heavy |
| Consumer understanding | Easy to explain | Rarely explained | Rarely explained |
| Key question to ask | “Was anything added or removed?” | “Why did it need fixing?” | “What had to happen to make this shelf stable?” |